Blog Archive

Showing posts with label NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Show all posts

Monday, February 9, 2026

Sustainability of Water Supply Projects

 

Sustainability of Water Supply Projects

 

Dhundi Raj Dahal, PhD

dhundi_raj2000@yahoo.com

 

Received: January 10, 2024; Revised & Accepted: June 22, 2024

Copyright: Dahal (2024)

  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License.

 

 

Abstract

Sustainability is one of the major issues for Water Supply and Sanitation activities/ projects. The project should have the measuring tools for the sustainable part. Water supply is one of the basic needs for human beings with all living things may come first air then water or soil in the universe to sustain. Sustainability indicators of water supply projects was determined by three major dimensions (i) technical, (ii) Socio-environmental, and (iii) Institutional [15]. Other aspects, functionality has divided with requirements, actions, and results. Sustainability is the combination of functionality index and sustainability dimensions on a fifty-fifty percent shearing base. The research has developed sustainability tools on the basis of available literatures and practical experiences. The tools have developed.  The project study has to take consideration for the sustainability from the pre-feasibility study, feasibility, detail study.

Keywords: Water supply, study, operation and maintenance, sustainability, functionality

 सारांश

पानी आपूर्ति र सरसफाइ गतिविधि/परियोजनाहरूको लागि टिकाउपन एक प्रमुख मुद्दा हो। परियोजनासँग टिकाउ पक्षको मापन उपकरणहरू हुनु पर्छ। पानी आपूर्ति मानव जीवनका साथै समस्त प्राणीका लागि एक आधारभूत आवश्यकता हो, जसको महत्व वायु र माटो पछिको स्थानमा आउँछ। पानी आपूर्ति परियोजनाहरूका टिकाउपन सूचकहरू तीन प्रमुख आयामहरूद्वारा निर्धारण गरिएको छ: (i) प्राविधिक, (ii) सामाजिक-वातावरणीय, र (iii) संस्थागत [१५]। अन्य पक्षहरूमा, कार्यक्षमतालाई आवश्यकताहरू, कार्यहरू, र परिणामहरूमा विभाजन गरिएको छ। टिकाउपन भनेको कार्यक्षमता सूचकाङ्क र टिकाउपन आयामहरूको पचास-पचास प्रतिशत आधारमा संयोजन हो। यस अनुसन्धानले उपलब्ध साहित्य र व्यावहारिक अनुभवको आधारमा टिकाउपन उपकरणहरू विकसित गरेको छ। परियोजना अध्ययनले पूर्व-व्यवहार्यता अध्ययन, व्यवहार्यता, विस्तृत अध्ययन देखि नै टिकाउपनको विचार गर्नु पर्छ।

कुञ्जीशब्दहरू: पानी आपूर्ति, अध्ययन, सञ्चालन र मर्मतसम्भार, टिकाउपन, कार्यक्षमता

Introduction

Sustainability is required in each and every step of the activities. Sustainability is one of the major issues for Water Supply and Sanitation Projects (WSSP). One has to take consideration for the sustainability from the pre-feasibility study, feasibility, detail project report (DPR) of the study, construction period, and operation and maintenance phase. The study team for any construction must think about the sustainable part from the very beginning to the life of the project. There is always a problem finding the measuring tools for this issue in water supply projects even though the word sustainability is socio technical. Any project should have the measuring tools for the sustainable part. Water supply is one of the basic needs for human beings with all living things may come first air then water or soil in the universe to survive.

 

Water is one of the fundamental needs to keep the body alive, because the body needs nutrients and water to work properly. However, billions of people in the world still lack access to safe drinking water and sanitation. According to sustainable goal report 2021, 2 billion (26%) people lack safely managed drinking water, 3.6 billion people lack safely managed sanitation, and 2.3 billion people lack basic hygiene. 129 countries are still not on track to have sustainably managed water resources by 2030 [1].   

In this context the research paper has developed the sustainable measuring tools for the completed or substantial completed water supply project.

 

1.     Literature Review and Research Methods

Mukharjee et. al (2003) described sustainability based on the publication of WSP & IRC (2003) as the satisfactory functioning and effective use of services, and equity for men and women, rich and poor everyone having equal access to benefits from projects. Another publication of IRC by Schouten et.al., (2003) included as a part of sustainability that a statement, a system that reliable sustainability met the needs of 80 % of the population wile leaving the poorest 20 % unserved cannot be counted a success [2]. The incorporation of a measure of social equity in the definition of sustainability.

Three Pillars of Sustainability

Since 1980s, when three pillars as (i) economic, (ii) social, and (iii) environmental of sustainability widely popularized in business, government agencies, and other organizations, applied in practice [3].  

Sustainability

Economic

Social

Environment

Figure 1: Three Pillars of Sustainability

Source: Moore, 2017

UNESCO Sustainability

The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has played a key role in the development of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs. It has adopted four pillars (i) Social equity, (ii) Economic development, (iii) Environmental protection, and (iv) Cultural/Human sustainability [4].

 

UN Sustainable Development Goal

Development agenda of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG6) envisions universal sustainable and equitable access to safe drinking water, sanitation and hygiene and elimination of open defecation by 2030 A.D. The targets of SDG6 for 2030 are [1]:

Target 6.1: By 2030 A.D., achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all.

Target 6.2: By 2030 A.D., achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations.

Target 6.3: By 2030 A.D., improve water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally.

Target 6.4: By 2030 A.D., substantially increase water-use efficiency across all sectors and ensure sustainable withdrawals and supply of freshwater to address water scarcity and substantially reduce the number of people suffering from water scarcity.

Target 6.5: By 2030 A.D., implement integrated water resources management at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate.

Target 6.6: By 2030 A.D., protect and restore water-related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, wetlands, rivers, aquifers, and lakes.

Target 6.A: By 2030 A.D., expand international cooperation and capacity-building support to developing countries in water- and sanitation-related activities and programs, including water harvesting, desalination, water efficiency, wastewater treatment, recycling and reuse technologies.

Target 6.B: Support and strengthen the participation of local communities in improving water and sanitation management.

 

Water Supply Sustainability in Global context

The European Union, America and Africa has discussed on water quality concern more than other issues like sustainability though in western countries there is no problems experienced of uncertainty.

The Dutch Drinking Water Decree outlines the legal requirements for drinking water quality. Limits on the concentrations of lead (10 micrograms per liter) and mercury (1 microgram per liter) in drinking water are among these regulations. The European Drinking Water Directive is the foundation for these standards. The evaluation's findings show that the Drinking Water Directive is a crucial piece of legislation that protects the quality of drinking water in European member states [5].

The Drinking Water Directive (EU 2020/2184), generally known as the Drinking Water Directive, has begun to be implemented in Finland. Making sure there is safe drinking water is the directive's main goal. This will be accomplished by looking at the drinking water quality standards established through risk management. The entire water production and distribution system, from raw water to tap water delivered to customers, must be considered throughout the risk assessment process. The World Health Organization's recommendations are typically revised together with the quality recommendations for drinking water at Finland [5].

Primary and secondary drinking water regulations exist in the USA. The National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR) are primary criteria and treatment methods that are legally enforceable for public water systems. Toxin levels in drinking water are reduced by primary standards and treatment methods, protecting public health. The National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs), developed by the EPA, define obligatory water quality limits for pollutants in drinking water [6].

 

Sustainability context in Nepal

The sustainability of water supply has evaluated in the context of water quality, quantity required by the users, and consistency of water supply service to the consumers have reviewed from the article published in Wash journal in 2023 [7]. The water quantity has been estimated that the urban water supply needs 100 liters to 120 liters that the project usually decides. Consistency has not been fixed yet but there are 24 hours in 360 days also found morning and evening service with enough quantity. Alternately, the supply water available whenever the consumers require is the consistency of supply. Normally, it depends on reasonably earlier repair in major and minor leakage in the system.

Government of Nepal (GoN) was committed for the provision of basic level water supply and sanitation facilities to all citizens by 2017. Water and sanitation are recognized as fundamental human rights [8].

 

Water Quality context in Nepal

Initially, GoN had adopted World Health Organization (WHO) standard for drinking water purpose but limited in theory only. It could not be made effective. After this effort, it had developed water quality standard in 2005, it stated that the existing water supplies not meeting National Drinking Water Quality Standards (NDWQS) will be improved in phased manner with appropriate treatment measures.

The Government of Nepal (GoN) has developed and made it mandatory to comply with its provisions in all new water supply systems and has triggered a water quality improvement in urban and rural water supplies, in 2022, GoN updated the National Drinking Water Quality Standards. The updated version has two tables Table ‘Ka’ and Table ‘Kha’. The parameters whose test is compulsory listed in table ‘Ka’ however, some other parameters are added in the Table ‘Kha’ according to risk and necessity of parameters for the test [9].

Salyankot Water Supply Project was studied on post-earthquake scenario during earthquake period 2015 by Mr. Shah with the dimensions as i) Technical, ii) Socio-environmental, iii) Institutional, and iv) Cost Recovery with corresponding core factors contributing for sustainability, these dimensions were identified [10]. 

Mangardh Water Supply Scheme was evaluated the water supply coverage aspect. The study was overall performance; technical performance, financial performance(tariff collection), and institutional performance (functionality index) with implementation status on the base of water safety plan (WSP) referring to the risk factor by Joshi et.al in 2020 [11].

 

Functionality

Performance is the attainment or fulfilment or functionality in the context of any development action. It also shows the sustainability part of the development project or action [12].

Institutional performance was evaluated on Dhankuta Water Supply Project by A.K. Mishra using water safety plan developed by DWSS/NMIP, 2014. The indicators were (i) WUSC registration, (ii) Own staff for maintenance, (iii) O & M fund, (iv) WUSC meetings, (v) Efficient water tariff collection, (vi) Records keeping, (vii) Spare tools & fittings, (viii) Implementation of water safety plan, (ix) Water supply service reliability, and (x) Accessibility with 100 unit of marks in Likert scale measurement [13].

Er. Ajita Devkota studied Anbukhaireni Water Supply and Sanitation Project in 2023 and found the performance which was analyzed based on the quality of water supply, reliability, and sufficiency, in which quality of water supply measured in accordance with the National Drinking Water Quality Standards [14].

 

Research Methods

Sustainability of water supply and sanitation projects has been reviewed on the past studies. The projects/ schemes have been tried to re-evaluate with the available tools. The practical experiences have fitted in the tools and further improved in detail so that there could be eased to evaluate without biasness.

The developed tools have further tested and found reliable to measure sustainable using Likert scale experience outcome from more than fifty water supply projects in Nepal. The findings have been discussed hereunder.   

The developed tools have chances of 10 per cent bias or 90 per cent level in unbiased. It is improved on the previous versions. Furthermore, this improved tool is easy to use for the water supply and sanitation projects.

 

Sustainability Dimensions

 

Sustainability Dimensions are the highest-level monitoring indicators adopted by WaterAid in Nepal. For water supply and sanitation projects, four monitoring dimensions are used (i) technical, (ii) socio-environmental, (iii) financial, and (iv) institutional. The dimension is significantly governed by many factors and subfactors. Principles of multi-criteria approaches, each set of criteria is rated depending upon its potential contribution or its significance in making the case sustainable. The weights given to dimensions, factors and sub-factors were determined through participatory methods involving sector professionals and field workers [15].

 

Conceptual Framework

Sustainability indicators of water supply projects was determined by three major dimensions (i) technical, (ii) Socio-environmental, and (iii) Institutional [15]. Next, functionality has divided with requirements, actions, and results. Sustainability is the combination of functionality index and sustainability dimensions.

The research design has been conceptualized as sustainability has two pillars (i) Functionality index, and (ii) Sustainability indicators with sub-indication as figured below.

 

 

 

Sustainability of the Projects/Actions

Functionality

Sustainability Index

Requirements

Actions

Results

Technical

Socio-environmental

Institutional

WUSC Registered, WUSC meetings, and Record keeping

Own Staff, O& M Fund, and Tariff Collection

Tools & Fittings, Water Safety Plan, Reliability, and Accessibility

Verification of QARQ (Quantity, Accessibility, Reliability, and Quality) level and physical status of the system

Health benefits (including water borne diseases) Time save, Environmental benefits, and GESI aspects 

Operation and functioning of Users Committee, Skilled Technicians, O & M practice, and Financial aspects (O & M cost, Institutional support, Capital cost recovery/ upgrading the system)

 

Figure 2: Conceptual Framework of Research Sustainability

Source: Author, 2024

 

2.     Results and Discussions

Functionality

Functionality index for Water Supply and Sanitation Projects (WSSP).

 

Table 1: Functionality index table

Indicator

Sub-indicators

Weightage

Not Serviceable

Up to 20%

20%-50%

50%-80%

80%-100%

Very Bad

Bad

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

0-5

1

2

3

4

5

Requirements (R)9/

WSUC Registered

 

Not Registered

Registered but not Renewed & Audited

Audited but not renewed

Renewed & GB till 2 yrs. back

Renewed & GB conducted

Yes (5), No (0)

1

2

3

4

5

WSUC Meetings

 

No meetings or once in a year meeting

Meeting in the desires of Chairperson

Regular less than tri-monthly meetings

Regular  tri-monthly meetings

Regular monthly meetings

Regular Yes (5), No (0)

1

2

3

4

5

Record keeping

 

Rarely record keeping of connection & Tariff

Record keeping of connection & Tariff in random system

Poorly records keepings, records are available but audited till before last year

Meetings, Water connection and tariff records keeping till last months

WUSC meetings, Staff meetings, Water connection and tariff updated records keeping

Proper (5), No (0

1

2

3

4

5

Action (A)

Having own staff with maintenance workers

 

No Staff

Poorly Staff hired with in daily wise basis

Poorly Staff hired with in monthly basis

Poorly managed Enough Staff

Sufficient staff with Job description

Yes (5), No (0)

1

2

3

4

5

O & M Fund Management

 

No fund

Poorly allocated fund for O & M

Fund  less than 3% of the Construction Cost

Fund  about 5% of the Construction Cost

Sufficient fund more than 5% of the Construction Cost

Sufficient (5), No (0)

1

2

3

4

5

Efficient water tariff collection

 

No tariff collection system

Poorly managed tariff collection system up to 40% of the billings

Tariffs collection 40-80%

Tariffs collection 80-95%

Tariffs collection 95% or more

Yes (5), No (0)

1

2

3

4

5

Tools and fittings reserve

 

No tools & spare parts

Tools are available but no spare parts

Poorly manage tools & spare parts

 Good managed tools & spare parts

 Well managed tools & spare parts stock for 3 months

Sufficient (5), No (0)

1

2

3

4

5

Results (R)

Water Safety Plan

Functional (5), Nonfunctional (0)

1

2

3

4

       5

Reliability (360 days’ supply)

 

Rarely Water Supply

Poorly Water Supply

Safe Water Supply in 4hrs (2mor +2eve)/360

Safe Water Supply in 8hrs (4mor +4eve)/360

Safe Water Supply in 24/360

Yes (5), Six month (0)

1

2

3

4

5

Accessibility of supply

 

Rarely Water Supply time to collect more than 30 min.

Poorly Water Accessible on the court yards with public tapstands within 30 min.

Manageable Water Accessible on the court yards

Sufficient Water Accessible on the court yards

Sufficient Water Accessible on the top of 3 story building

15 minutes (5), More than 30 minutes (0)

1

2

3

4

5

 

The calculation score of functionalities will be higher to the lower based on risk factors as the indicators of the index.

The calculation of sustainability will be in weighted 50% for functionality and 50% for Sustainability dimension for the whole activities or project considering risk factors.

 

Sustainability Dimensions

Sustainability index or dimension of Water Supply and Sanitation Projects (WSSP) has been modified in the three-pillar system as (i) Technical, (ii) Socio-environmental, and (iii) Institutional as stated earlier.

 

Table 2: Sustainability Dimension Table

Sustainability Dimensions

 Sub-Dimensions

Weightage

V. Bad

Bad

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

1

2

3

4

5

 

Quantity of water

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

 

 

%

30-

40+

50+

80+

90+

 

 

 

 

Technical

 

 

 

 

 

Physical Quality of water

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Nos. 5 compulsory(C) +1=6 of parameter within limit 

2C-

2C+

3C+

5C

6/6

Chemical Quality of water

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

 Nos. 12 compulsory(C) +1=13 of parameter within limit  

5-

5+

7+

12

13/13

Biological Quality of water

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

  Microbial parameter % samples within limit 

50-

50+

80

95

100

Reliability of water supply

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

 

As per risks 

Physical status/ Structures of the system

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

As per risks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Institutional

 

 

 

Timely General Assembly

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

 As per risks 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Tariff collection System

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Active involvement of WUSC team

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Record keeping Mechanism

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Community Technicians for O&M

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

 

Socio-environmental

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gender Equity and Social Inclusion status in team

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Social

Security Risk for woman

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Environmental Health status/water borne diseases after the project

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Managing Operation and Maintenance fund

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Tariff collection

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

 Collection in % 

Less than 20

20-40

40-60

60-80

80-100

Economy Availability of fund from local bodies and others organization

1-5

1

2

3

4

5

Source: Author, 2024

 

Risks will be categorized by the researcher as the sustainability sub-dimensions of the system. The score of the risks will be prejudiced as the higher to the lower.

 

Conclusion and Recommendation

The project sustainability will be adopted in weighted 50% for functionality index and 50% for Sustainability dimension for the whole activities or project considering risk factors. The criteria has been fixed as per the experience on water supply and sanitation projects with reviewing the available literature.

Sustainability is one of the serious issues for Water Supply and Sanitation Projects (WSSP). One has to take consideration for the sustainability from the pre-feasibility study, feasibility, detail study. Further research and criteria could be reviewed for the project, as per the time advanced and complexity come to the situation.

 

References

[1]

United Nation, "The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021, Water for Life," United Nations Publication, New York, 2005.

[2]

X. Schouten, "Predicting Sustainable Performance and Household Satisfaction of Community-oriented Rural Water Supply Project," IRC, 2003.

[3]

Y. Moore, "Developing a Comprehensive Definition of Sustainability," Implementation Science, vol. 12, no. 10.1186/s13012-017-0637-1, p. 110, 2017.

[4]

UNESCO, "Sustainable Development | UNESCO," [Online]. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development. [Accessed 13 10 2023].

[5]

G. Finland, "WHO," Government of Finland, [Online]. Available: https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/-/1271139/finland-starts-implementing-eu-s-new-drinking-water-directive. [Accessed 22 5 2022].

[6]

E. P. Agency, The National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, Wasington D.C.: https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/secondary-drinking-water-standards-guidance-nuisance-chemicals, 2022.

[7]

A. Devkota and D. R. Dahal, "Water Quality Review of Anbhukhaireni Water Supply Project," Wash Journal, vol. 20, no. March 2023, 2023.

[8]

GON, "Water Supply and Sanitation Policy," DWSSM, Kathmandu, 2014.

[9]

GoN, National Water Quality Standard 2022, Kathmandu: Ministry of Water Supply, 2022.

[10]

A. K. Mishra, "International Journal of Operations Management and Information Technology.," International Journal of Operations Management and Information Technology., Vols. 8-1, no. http://www.ripublication.com, pp. 1-30, 2018.

[11]

G. Joshi, A. K. Mishra and &. J. Ghimire, "Performance Assessment of Water Supply Scheme: A Case Study of Mangadh Water Supply Scheme, Nepal," TEST Engineering & Management, vol. 83, no. May-Jun 2020, pp. 30105-30116, 2020.

[12]

"Performance," Dictionary.com, [Online]. Available: https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/performance. [Accessed 13 10 2023].

[13]

A. K. Mishra, "Institutional Performance Assessment of Water Supply System," Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies, no. Middle East Publication, pp. 698-707, 2020.

[14]

D. Ajita, Sustainability of Water Supply Project : A case Study of Anbukhaireni Water Supply and Sanitation Project, Kathmandu: Pokhara University, 2023.

[15]

A. K. Mishra, "Sustainability and Risk Assessment of Salyankot Water Supply Project in Post Earthquake Scenario," Intenational Journal of Operations Management and Information Technology ISSN 2778-3628, vol. 8, no. http://www.ripublication.com, pp. 1-30, 2018.

 

 (Karki, Mahat, & Neupane, 2023) (Shrestha, Mahat, & Neupane, 2024)  (Subedi & Neupane, 2018). (Neupane D. , 2019). (Neupane D. , 2014). (Neupane D. , 2018). (Panta, Neupane, & Bhattarai, 2023). (Regmi, Adhikari, Ghimire, & Neupane, 2018) (Ghimire & Neupane, 2022) (Dhakal, Adhikari, Ghimire, & Neupane, 2018)  (Shrestha & Timalsena, 2023) (Neupane D. , 2014) (Lamichhane & Neupane, 2023).  (Mahat, Karki, Neupane, Shrestha, & Shrestha, 2024)    (Neupane & Ghimire, 2023) (Ghimire & Lamichhane, 2024) (Adhikari & Thapa, 2024; Airi & Bhattarai, 2024; Dangol & Mishra, 2024; Dhungel, 2024; Khadka et al., 2024; Neupane & Baral, 2024; Pandey, 2024; Pariyar et al., 2024; Rimal et al., 2024; Sigdel & Rijal, 2024; Timilsina, 2024)

 

Acharya, B. (2024). Education Policies and Practices for Ensuring Quality Education in Nepal. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 158-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i1.65271

Agormedah, E. K., Britwum, F., A. S., A. E., & Kusi-Appiah, V. (2024). Psychological Distress and Students’ Academic Achievement in the Colleges of Education: Does Gender Matter? Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 40–61. https:, 40-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i1.65245

Dhakal, R. L., Adhikari, D. B., Ghimire, M. N., & Neupane, D. (2018). An explorative study of academic performance of school students with reference to Ethnicity. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(5), 36-38.

Ghimire, M. N., & Neupane, D. (2022). An Exploratory Study on Status of Homestays from Lamjung. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (NJMR), 5(5), 119-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v5i5.51812

Karki, T. B., Mahat, D., & Neupane, D. (2023). Exploring the Academic Landscape: A Critical Analysis and Review of the Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 128-138.

Lamichhane, B., & Neupane, D. (2023). Perceived Organizational Support in Nepalese Banks. International Journal of Atharva, 1(1), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/ija.v1i1.58835

Mahat, D., Karki, T. B., Neupane, D., Shrestha, D. K., & Shrestha, S. (2024). Decolonization in Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Articles from 2010 to 2023. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i1.65142

Neupane, A., & Ghimire, M. N. (2023). Age Bar for the Retirement of Politicians. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 102-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v6i1.54356

Neupane, D. (2014). Age and Peer Victimization among School Adolescents in Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Advanced Academic Research (JAAR), 1(1), 18-23.

Neupane, D. (2014). Gender Role in School Bullying. Journal of Chitwan Medical College, 4(7), 37-41. Retrieved from https://www.cmc.edu.np/images/gallery/Original%20Articles/oGfWOoriginal7.pdf

Neupane, D. (2018). Food Choice Motives of Guardians of Trilok Academy Kathmandu with reference to Gender. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (NJMR), 1(1), 73-81.

Neupane, D. (2019). Food choice motives of adults from Kathmandu city with reference to ethnicity. International Journal of Applied Research, 5(3), 182-185.

Odigwe, M., & Mchi, A. A. (2024). The Impact of Covid-19 on Urban Planning of Port Harcourt City, Nigeria. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 111-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i1.65268

Panta, S., Neupane, D., & Bhattarai, P. (2023). Preferred Learning Techniques among Bachelor’s Level Students. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (NJMR), 6(2), 145-154. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v6i2.57660

Regmi, R. B., Adhikari, D. B., Ghimire, M., & Neupane, D. (2018). An exploratory research on academic performance of school students with reference to religion. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(5), 76-81.

Shastha Banu, A. A. (2024). Healing through Ruqyah and Academic Achievement of Children in Muslim Community. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 124-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i1.65269

Shrestha, R., & Timalsena, C. (2023). Perceived External CSR from Employees’ Perspective in Nepalese Banking Industry. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (NJMR), 6(3), 145-155. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v6i3.59718

Shrestha, S., Mahat, D., & Neupane, D. (2024). Quantitative Research Design and Sample Trends: A Systematic Examination of Emerging Paradigms and Best Practices. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(2), 20-27. doi:10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i02.002

Subedi, C. K., & Neupane, D. (2018). Gender differences in learning style preferences of high school students. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(1), 215-221.

 

Adhikari, L., & Thapa, M. (2024). Exploring Forms and Practices of Menstruation in the Changing Social System: A Study of Suryabinayak-05, Katunje, Bhaktapur. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65637

Airi, L. B., & Bhattarai, S. P. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Media Content on Social Media Engagement Through Comment Analysis. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65461

Dangol, S., & Mishra, R. (2024). Patient Characteristics on Satisfaction with Healthcare Quality in a Teaching Hospital in Nepal. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65632

Dhungel, H. B. (2024). Impact of Climate Change on the Farming Community of Bhaktapur District of Nepal. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65496

Ghimire, S., & Lamichhane, M. R. (2024). The Concept of National Security in Kautilya’s Arthashastra. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65599

Khadka, S., Nyaupane, N. P., & Timalsena, C. (2024). Assessing the Relationship between Demographic Attributes and Patients’ Views of Hospital Environment. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65626

Neupane, A., & Baral, B. R. (2024). Understanding Suicide Cases in Nepal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Personality Traits. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65602

Pandey, L. (2024). Interplay of Corporate Sector, Politics, and Media in Shaping News Contents in Nepal. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65656

Pariyar, M. S., Bhujel, S., Kushwaha, S., Gyawali, A., Lama, S., & Neupane, D. K. (2024). Exploring Elements of Style in the Poem “Drought”: Unraveling the Layers of Meaning. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65617

Rimal, P., Bhattarai, P., Pokhrel, P., Pradhananga, P., Shahi, P., Magar, P. R., & Ghimire, J. C. (2024). Assessing the Relationship between Students Attitude and Online Shopping. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65625

Sigdel, U., & Rijal, T. (2024). Persistent and implications of Changing Livelihood in Hill Setting of Nepal: A Qualitative Inquiry of Vyas-10 of Tanahun. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65494

Timilsina, S. K. (2024). Loss of Citizenship Provisions in Nepal’s Citizenship Law: Addressing the Risk of Statelessness in Accordance with International Conventions. Baneshwor Campus Journal of Academia, 3(1), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.3126/bcja.v3i1.65658